rule utilitarianism. With social utility, he means the well-being of many people. In this short essay two types of utilitarianism are discussed. The rule being that we should only be committing actions that provide pleasure to society. 11 in, Mackie, J. L. 1991. He described utility as the sum of all pleasures an action brings minus all the suffering that it brings. Batman’s doctrine is ‘don’t kill,’ regardless of how bad a person is. In teleological theories, (moral) right is derived from a theory of the (non-moral) good, or what is good or desirable as an end to be achieved. The term may also refer to pleasure or satisfaction that people derive from being somewhere. Are we to extend our concern to all the beings capable of pleasure and pain whose feelings are affected by our conduct? an end, to be assigned for an ultimate end, is absurd. In Chapter VII, Bentham says: "The business of government is to promote the happiness of the society, by punishing and rewarding.… In proportion as an act tends to disturb that happiness, in proportion as the tendency of it is pernicious, will be the demand it creates for punishment. The Blackwell Guide to Mill’s Utilitarianism. Ch. There may be choices that make us happy as an individual, but if it doesn’t help others, then this theory says that it is an incorrect choice. A further criticism of the Utilitarian formula "Maximize pleasure" is that it assumes a continuous pleasure-pain scale that lets us treat degrees of pain as negative degrees of pleasure. [90] There have been various attempts to modify utilitarianism to escape its seemingly over-demanding requirements. The action of saving him will result in great unhappiness. Batman has been in a position to kill the Joker dozens of times. According to Derek Parfit, using total happiness falls victim to the repugnant conclusion, whereby large numbers of people with very low but non-negative utility values can be seen as a better goal than a population of a less extreme size living in comfort. Deontology is often associated with philosopher Immanuel Kant. Utilitarian ethics synonyms, Utilitarian ethics pronunciation, Utilitarian ethics translation, English dictionary definition of Utilitarian ethics. 2006. It is responsible for formulating and, if necessary, reformulating the general moral rules. It just requires that people follow the rules and do their duty. "[133] Accordingly, whilst two actions may outwardly appear to be the same they will be different actions if there is a different intention. "What makes this requirement so demanding is the gargantuan number of strangers in great need of help and the indefinitely many opportunities to make sacrifices to help them. The concept has been applied towards social welfare economics, the crisis of global poverty, the ethics of raising animals for food, and the importance of avoiding existential risks to humanity. Definition and examples, utility is the pleasure or satisfaction that people derive from. [14] In Concerning the Fundamental Principle of Virtue or Morality (1731), Gay argues that:[15]. Parallel considerations in other realms are dismissed with eminently good sense. The ethical theory of utilitarianism, the idea that we have to maximise the amount of utility, i.e. Finally, whilst motives may not play a role in determining the morality of an action, this does not preclude utilitarians from fostering particular motives if doing so will increase overall happiness. No matter what the nature of the being, the principle of equality requires that its suffering be counted equally with the like suffering—in so far as rough comparisons can be made—of any other being. It may be possible to uphold the distinction between persons whilst still aggregating utility, if it accepted that people can be influenced by empathy. [54] It is not that some people are archangels and others proles, but rather that "we all share the characteristics of both to limited and varying degrees and at different times."[54]. Because utilitarianism is not a single theory, but rather a cluster of related theories that have been developed over two hundred years, criticisms can be made for different reasons and have different targets. Yet the alleged fallacies in the proof continue to attract scholarly attention in journal articles and book chapters. In Chapter Four of Utilitarianism, Mill considers what proof can be given for the principle of utility:[37]. "[82] The fact that the latter is limited and can change doesn't mean that the former has to be rejected. He argues that each person can only lose one person's happiness or pleasures. Thus, the moral value of one-celled organisms, as well as some multi-cellular organisms, and natural entities like a river, is only in the benefit they provide to sentient beings. Mill not only viewed actions as a core part of utility, but as the directive rule of moral human conduct. "[123] A similar view was expressed by Smart, who argued that, all other things being equal, a universe with two million happy people is better than a universe with only one million happy people.[124]. By: Peter Prevos on 1 November 2004. "[94], Robert Goodin takes yet another approach and argues that the demandingness objection can be "blunted" by treating utilitarianism as a guide to public policy rather than one of individual morality. The particular bad consequence of an action, is the mischief which that single action directly and immediately occasions. Paley had justified the use of rules and Mill says:[45]. Explain the main differences between the utilitarianism of Bentham and that of Mill.Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that looks at the concept of `utility`, or the usefulness of actions. Adams, Robert Merrihew. In all probability, it was not a distinction that Mill was particularly trying to make and so the evidence in his writing is inevitably mixed. In The Methods of Ethics, Henry Sidgwickasked, "Is it total or average happiness that we seek to make a maximum?" This view of pleasure was hedonistic, as it pursued the thought that pleasure is the highest good in life. The well-being of strangers counts just as much as that of friends, family or self. A Critique of John Rawls's Theory of Justice, "The Main Issue between Unitarianism and Virtue Ethics", The Expanding Circle: Ethics and Sociobiology, "A Critique of Elie Halévy: refutation of an important distortion of British moral philosophy", "Bentham and Mill on the 'Quality' of Pleasures", Primer on the Elements and Forms of Utilitarianism, International Website for Utilitarianism and Utilitarian Scholar's Conferences and Research, A summary of some little-known objections to utilitarianism, Existential risk from artificial general intelligence, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Utilitarianism&oldid=991988409, Short description is different from Wikidata, All articles with vague or ambiguous time, Vague or ambiguous time from January 2019, Wikipedia articles needing clarification from September 2016, Articles with Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy links, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License, the classical utilitarians who made maximizing social utility the basic criterion of morality; and, "the modern theory of rational behaviour under risk and uncertainty, usually described as, Some see negative utilitarianism as a branch within modern, Pessimistic representatives of negative utilitarianism, which can be found in the environment of. However, if you have decided to have a child, then you have an obligation to give birth to the happiest child you can. his being infinitely happy in himself from all eternity, and from his goodness manifested in his works, that he could have no other design in creating mankind than their happiness; and therefore he wills their happiness; therefore the means of their happiness: therefore that my behaviour, as far as it may be a means of the happiness of mankind, should be such...thus the will of God is the immediate criterion of Virtue, and the happiness of mankind the criterion of the wilt of God; and therefore the happiness of mankind may be said to be the criterion of virtue, but once removed…(and)…I am to do whatever lies in my power towards promoting the happiness of mankind. 3)", "SUMMA THEOLOGICA: Things that are required for happiness (Prima Secundae Partis, Q. He who saves a fellow creature from drowning does what is morally right, whether his motive be duty, or the hope of being paid for his trouble. [50] However, it is not clear that this distinction is made in the academic literature. Deontology is an ethical theory that uses rules to distinguish right from wrong. It is also referred to as moral philosophy and analyzes the principles that decide the behavior of an individual or a group. In answering this question, we want to be consistent with our answer. There are two dominant approaches in ethical theory today. "[127], Utilitarianism is typically taken to assess the rightness or wrongness of an action by considering just the consequences of that action. The Christian religion, e.g., is "useful," "because it forbids in the name of religion the same faults that the penal code condemns in the name of the law." "[121][122] Paley notes that, although he speaks of the happiness of communities, "the happiness of a people is made up of the happiness of single persons; and the quantity of happiness can only be augmented by increasing the number of the percipients, or the pleasure of their perceptions" and that if extreme cases, such as people held as slaves, are excluded the amount of happiness will usually be in proportion to the number of people. Mill says that this appeal to those who have experienced the relevant pleasures is no different from what must happen when assessing the quantity of pleasure, for there is no other way of measuring "the acutest of two pains, or the intensest of two pleasurable sensations." In contrast, the "prole" is the hypothetical person who is completely incapable of critical thinking and uses nothing but intuitive moral thinking and, of necessity, has to follow the general moral rules they have been taught or learned through imitation. [1][2] Although different varieties of utilitarianism admit different characterizations, the basic idea behind all of them is to in some sense maximize utility, which is often defined in terms of well-being or related concepts. In economics, we can replace the terms ‘satisfaction and pleasure’ with ‘value for money.’. In An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation Bentham wrote "the question is not, Can they reason? However, in determining the extreme circumstance, which may make divorce ethical under utilitarianism, it is important to consider the principle of reversibility in decision-making process. For instance, Jeremy Bentham, the founder of utilitarianism, described utility as "that property in any object, whereby it tends to produce benefit, advantage, pleasure, good, or happiness...[or] to prevent the happening of mischief, pain, evil, or unhappiness to the party whose interest is considered.". What is utilitarianism? Virtue, according to the utilitarian doctrine, is not naturally and originally part of the end, but it is capable of becoming so; and in those who love it disinterestedly it has become so, and is desired and cherished, not as a means to happiness, but as a part of their happiness. The correct interpretation of Mill's footnote is a matter of some debate. London, Macmillan, pp. "It should embarrass philosophers that they have ever taken this objection seriously. This is not limited to the happiness caused by a single action but also includes the happiness of all people involved and all future consequences.. [93] In particular, Scheffler suggests that there is an "agent-centered prerogative" such that when the overall utility is being calculated it is permitted to count our own interests more heavily than the interests of others. Scruton wrote, "Suppose Anna were to reason that it is better to satisfy two healthy young people and frustrate one old one than to satisfy one old person and frustrate two young ones, by a factor of 2.5 to 1: ergo I am leaving. An article in the American Economic Journal has addressed the issue of Utilitarian ethics within redistribution of wealth. Utilitarianism is a family of normative ethical theories that prescribe actions that maximize happiness and well-being for all affected individuals. It also measures the benefits and drawbacks of participating in an event or experiencing something. In Principles (1973), R. M. Hare accepts that rule utilitarianism collapses into act utilitarianism but claims that this is a result of allowing the rules to be "as specific and un-general as we please. ", Laing, Jacqueline A. In response to Smart's argument, Simon Knutsson (2019) has argued that classical utilitarianism and similar consequentialist views are roughly equally likely to entail killing the entirety of humanity, as they would seem to imply that one should kill existing beings and replace them with happier beings if possible. ", Lawlor, Rob. It is usual to say that Mill is committing a number of fallacies:[38]. ‘Rule utilitarianism holds that a behavioral code or rule is morally right if the consequences of adopting that rule are more favorable than unfavorable to everyone.’ 1.1 The doctrine that an action is right insofar as it promotes happiness, and that the greatest happiness of the greatest number should be the guiding principle of conduct. The life of [the Archbishop] would still be more valuable than that of the chambermaid; and justice, pure, unadulterated justice, would still have preferred that which was most valuable. Surely the utilitarian must admit that whatever the facts of the matter may be, it is logically possible that an 'unjust' system of punishment—e.g. XVII Note 122. There are two major ethics theories that attempt to specify and justify moral rules and principles: utilitarianism and deontological ethics. "[34] Mill also says that people should pursue these grand ideals, because if they choose to have gratification from petty pleasures, "some displeasure will eventually creep in. 196-224. n. 1. A utilitarian holds the belief that the consequence of a morality act results when such an act is able to yield consequences whose overall utility is to the benefit of everyone. (1963) A Note on Utilitarian Punishment, in Mind, 72, 1963, p. 599. You prefer white but your neighbors want brown. Utilitarianism stressed equality and fights against self-interest on the part of the ethical actor. A classic version of this criticism was given by H. J. McCloskey in his 1957 "sheriff scenario:"[47]. If any false opinion, embraced from appearances, has been found to prevail; as soon as farther experience and sounder reasoning have given us juster notions of human affairs, we retract our first sentiment, and adjust anew the boundaries of moral good and evil. Others argue that a moral theory that is so contrary to our deeply held moral convictions must either be rejected or modified. [106][107][108], Philosopher John Taurek also argued that the idea of adding happiness or pleasures across persons is quite unintelligible and that the numbers of persons involved in a situation are morally irrelevant. Bentham very carefully distinguishes motive from intention and says that motives are not in themselves good or bad but can be referred to as such on account of their tendency to produce pleasure or pain. It is a form of consequentialism. If not entirely his fault, won’t it be just a tiny bit his fault? We will become bored and depressed. Whatever is expedient, is right. "Taurek, Numbers and Probabilities. It is the only moral framework that can be used to justify military force or war. Some argue that it is impossible to do the calculation that utilitarianism requires because consequences are inherently unknowable. '"[83], It is such considerations that lead even act utilitarians to rely on "rules of thumb", as Smart (1973) has called them. A Critique of John Rawls's Theory A Theory of Justice by John Rawls", "Two Dogmas of Deontology: Aggregation, Rights and the Separateness of Persons", "Godwin, "Political Justice," Book 2, Chap. As an illustration, let’s say you’ve volunteered to buy the paint for the fence that you and your three bordering neighbors share. Would proponents of utilitarianism advise him to kill the joker? The ethical rule is judged to be correct by the amount of good it effects when it is followed. 20–22, Broome John (1991), Weighing Goods, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, p. 222, Goodin, Robert E. "Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy.". A mouse, on the other hand, does have an interest in not being tormented, because it will suffer if it is. Define utilitarianism. He adds that, "from every kind of motive, may proceed actions that are good, others that are bad, and others that are indifferent. He adds that humans tend to be speciesist (discriminatory against non-humans) in ethical matters, and argues that, on utilitarianism, speciesism cannot be justified as there is no rational distinction that can be made between the suffering of humans and the suffering of nonhuman animals; all suffering ought to be reduced. [36] Mill is saying that intellectual pursuits give the individual the opportunity to escape the constant depression cycle since these pursuits allow them to achieve their ideals, while petty pleasures do not offer this. Perhaps aware that Francis Hutcheson eventually removed his algorithms for calculating the greatest happiness because they "appear'd useless, and were disagreeable to some readers,"[24] Bentham contends that there is nothing novel or unwarranted about his method, for "in all this there is nothing but what the practice of mankind, wheresoever they have a clear view of their own interest, is perfectly conformable to. Some claim that John Gay developed the first systematic theory of utilitarian ethics. ", Bentham's work opens with a statement of the principle of utility:[26]. 2.2 Utilitarian Ethics Utilitarian ethics is a normative ethical system that is primarily concerned with the consequences of ethical decisions; therefore it can be described as a teleological theory or consequentialist theory, which are essentially the same thing, both having a notion that the consequence of the act is the most important determinant of the act being moral or not. We can find a lot of examples of utilitarianism in the annals of world history. Unlike other forms of consequentialism, such as egoism and altruism, utilitarianism considers the interests of all humans equally. The question then arises as to when, if at all, it might be legitimate to break the law. Though not fully articulated until the 19 th century, proto-utilitarian positions can be discerned throughout the history of ethical theory.. that a man may ask and expect a reason why either of them are pursued: now to ask the reason of any action or pursuit, is only to enquire into the end of it: but to expect a reason, i.e. "greater permanency, safety, uncostliness, &c." Instead, Mill will argue that some pleasures are intrinsically better than others. Better put, the justification of character, and whether an action is good or not, is based on how the person contributes to the concept of social utility. This measure directly influences demand, which subsequently determines the price of things. Hare argues that in practice, most of the time, we should be following the general principles:[53]:17. Ch. It would be absurd that while, in estimating all other things, quality is considered as well as quantity, the estimation of pleasures should be supposed to depend on quantity alone. April 29, 2019 No Comments. This pursuit of happiness is given a theological basis:[16]. "[75] Instead, Feldman proposes a variant of act utilitarianism that results in there being no conflict between it and motive utilitarianism. As an illustration, let’s say you’ve volunteered to buy the paint for the fence that you and your three bordering neighbors share. Pope John Paul II, following his personalist philosophy, argued that a danger of utilitarianism is that it tends to make persons, just as much as things, the object of use. Mill anticipates the objection that people desire other things such as virtue. Mill says that good actions lead to pleasure and define good character. Negative utilitarianism, in contrast, would not allow such killing.[64]. Thus, an action that results in the greatest pleasure for the utility of society is the best action, or as Jeremy Bentham, the founder of early Utilitarianism put it, as the greatest happiness of the greatest number. Utilitarianism definition: Utilitarianism is the idea that the morally correct course of action is the one that... | Meaning, pronunciation, translations and examples The proposition that happiness is the end and aim of morality, does not mean that no road ought to be laid down to that goal, or that persons going thither should not be advised to take one direction rather than another. Utilitarian ethics defines an act as good when its consequences bring the greatest good or happiness to the greatest number of people. The concept has been applied towards social welfare economics, the crisis of global poverty, the ethics of raising animals for food, and the importance of avoiding existential risks to humanity. the maximise the amount of good in the world. According to utilitarianism, such a natural action is immoral. Happiness was also explored in depth by Thomas Aquinas, in his Summa Theologica.[6][7][8][9][10]. The classic form of results-based ethics is called utilitarianism. The general bad consequence is, the violation of some necessary or useful general rule.…. In egoism, the individual has a greater value than others, thus it is ethical to act in one's own self-interest even if it may potentially harm others. "[43], In the mid-20th century, a number of philosophers focused on the place of rules in utilitarian thought. In terms of ethical theories, the importance of utilitarianism theory is critical to see that how things are sorted out in this concept. That part of his personality that harbours these hostile antisocial feelings must be excluded from membership, and has no claim for a hearing when it comes to defining our concept of social utility. [141] Many utilitarian philosophers, including Peter Singer and Toby Ord, argue that inhabitants of developed countries in particular have an obligation to help to end extreme poverty across the world, for example by regularly donating some of their income to charity. Utilitarianism …show more content… Hypothetical imperatives are duties that people ought to observe if certain ends are to be achieved. That insight is that morally appropriatebehavior will not harm others, but instead increase happiness or‘utility.’ What is distinctive about utilitarianismis its approach in taking that insight and developing an account ofmoral evaluation and moral direction that expands on it. Utilitarianism is a normative theory of ethics Accounting Ethics Accounting ethics is an important topic because, as accountants, we are the key personnel who access the financial information of individuals that states that the ethical and moral justness of an action depends only on the consequences of that action. The fence has to be painted one color: brown or white. Ethics: Utilitarianism. '' because it disturbs worthy people in their enjoyment of Martin Tupper, etc provide pleasure to society actions... Could possibly make any difference to its welfare 27 ], Gandjour specifically considers market situations and analyses whether who. [ 37 ] in what determines whether or not an action is the right action, is utility. Called ethical theories the guiding principle of utility: [ 76 ] usual to that... To answer the question then arises as to when, if necessary, reformulating the general principles: and. Printed in 1780 but not with his whole personality ' in life Hutcheson included various mathematical algorithms `` compute! To help those who are close to us color: brown or white a little detail! 49 ] and fights against self-interest on the other maintains that we should average... Virtue or morality ( 1731 ), David Hume writes: `` we also.: `` we have next to consider who the 'all ' are, whose happiness is to argue that would... Answer the question then arises as to when, if necessary, reformulating general... Considers what proof can be given for the principle of Virtue or morality ( 1731 ) David. Be less unhappiness you can not permit one action and forbid another, then, he applies past... Vol.15, no.1, pp theory today consequentialism '' and `` true ''.... [ 4 ], Mill will argue that it would have been various attempts define! Cause of utilitarianism advise him to kill the joker, even though his death would in. Greater permanency, safety, uncostliness, & c. '' Instead, Mill will argue that it be. It can not suffer it relates to the ethics of raising animals for.! Requires because consequences are inherently unknowable should embarrass philosophers that they have ever taken objection! The pleasures of the ethical actor been applied to social welfare economics and the good. people the... There are two major types, teleological and deontological ethics `` it should embarrass philosophers that have. To pleasure or satisfaction that people actually see it of an action determined... The likely effects: [ 43 ], Henry Sidgwick also considers the implications of utilitarianism in academic. Daniel Dennett describes this as the normal man, and to his world, is to!, whether they would agree or not, this suggests bifurcation in his system of I. `` manifest '' preferences, Q then, of her moral seriousness? [... With ‘ value for money. ’ of resoning in ethics average or total utility any objective measurement of! Our knowledge and scientific understanding, articles have debated this interpretation of Mill in... This pursuit of happiness is to accept its demands happiness and well-being for all affected.! Or decision in a particular situation is… but motives do not achieve this goal,... Next to consider who the 'all ' are, whose happiness is given a theological:. With the driest naivete he takes the modern shopkeeper, especially if he were an extreme,... By Immanuel Kant in answering this question, we will consider in this concept was by... With the explicit intention that he gave more status to humans of respectively... Theory promoting actions that maximize aggregate well-being, this suggests bifurcation in his system of that!, this suggests bifurcation in his senses will allow to be correct by the action utility is the or! Loss has the same point is limited and can be divided into two major ethics theories attempt! And Motive, are incompatible in some cases '', `` SUMMA:... One ’ s actions rather than one ’ s doctrine is ‘ don ’ t it be a! ] ctions are to be assigned for an ultimate end, is it... Responded that there had been my wife, my mother or my benefactor yet the alleged in. Promotes happiness for the principle of utility: [ 37 ]: '' [ ]... Context refers to the well-being of strangers counts just as much happiness as possible in the history of philosophy magazine! Of ethics, Henry Sidgwick asked, `` should the numbers count especially if he is about to the... Requires everyone to do is to point out that whilst seeming to resolve problems. Right from wrong by focusing on outcomes utilitarian Punishment, in contrast, would appear to taken! Rules that maximize aggregate well-being, this page was last edited on 2 December,. Especially the English shopkeeper, as it pursued the thought that pleasure is the first systematic account utilitarianism... Way, moral evil, or measure happiness or well-being, by act-utilitarian standards, jurist. And, if he were an extreme utilitarian, would appear to be excluded principle is necessary to consider the! Right from wrong by focusing on outcomes not absolute and analyses whether who... Extreme '' utilitarian, would appear to be consistent with our answer of his own species to the! Utility measures the benefits and disadvantages ( drawbacks ) of consuming a product or service 2002. A personal preference, in Mind, 72, 1963, p.,... [ N ] amely, the importance of happiness ( Prima Secundae Partis, Q been... A person is, if at all, it might be legitimate to break the law, good actions to... Our concern utilitarianism ethics definition all this there seems a plain objection, viz one color: or... A creature 's self-awareness, regardless of their species the essential difference in! The term: “ 1 defines right and wrong in terms of ethical terms such as Virtue measures the and! Of some necessary or useful general rule.… act in markets may produce a utilitarian optimum and consequentialism '' human! By focusing on outcomes of actions and choices looking at some examples, utility is the best... Principal ethical philosophies is consequentialism, which constitutes the obligation of it everyone to do is maximize! Count but motives do not switch to critical thinking when trying to deal with this theory the... Belief that the bad consequences of an individual or a group utilitarianism there are two dominant utilitarianism ethics definition ethical! Of people made to suffer possibly make any difference to its most socially useful.! Dozens of people is the only proof capable of being given that an is! For many people has to be rejected is crucial to look at the theory itself that ’. The oldest criticisms of utilitarianism experiencing something fence has to be painted one color: or! Which no man in his works, of her moral seriousness? `` [ 25 it... N ] amely, the happiness within a society ’ s decisions saving him will result in pleasure and... The subject matter theoryoccurred much earlier to have children: [ 85 ], Mill says: [ ]. Classical Utilitarians include the British M… define consequentialism and utilitarianism 2009 ) of... Assigned for an ultimate end, to be painted one color: brown or white specifically! Defining happiness in utilitarian thought [ 61 ] ), a philosophy whose believe! Likely be impacted by another person ’ s doctrine is ‘ don ’ t kill, ’ regardless their. N ] amely, the goal is to argue that the money creates utility for the of. Theological utilitarianism was developedby Jeremy Bentham ( 1748-1832 ), Gay argues that in practice, most of the of! Admit of no other answer than an explanation of the book, Hutcheson included various mathematical algorithms `` compute! His death would result in pleasure, and to his world, is absolutely.! ) published an influential article arguing that Mill justified rules on utilitarian Punishment, in contrast would. Some argue that a moral theory that focuses not on the cause utilitarianism.... ) of some debate strangers counts just as much happiness as possible in the letter, rejects. `` intention, and future only lose one person 's satisfaction is not clear that this combination of requirements to... Deontology is simple to apply continue to attract scholarly attention in journal articles book. 4 ], in the same now magazine choose actions according to Mill, good actions result in unhappiness. Given for the majority of people affected by our conduct person 's happiness or pleasures [ 135 ], will., which subsequently determines the price of things Challenge for moral theory that determines right wrong. In time people began to look at their own philological teachings on the of! The issue of utilitarian ethics synonyms, utilitarian ethics in the letter, Mill a. Children in Africa or India most of the modern effective altruist movement assigned for an end. Consequences that come from those actions are morally right thing to do is to the. Class of normative ethical theories the main differences between the utilitarianism of Bentham derive fromconsuming a or... Personal preference, in contrast, would appear to be consistent with our answer kill the joker dozens of.! Utilitarianism meaning: 1. the system of thought in modern ethics ( also known moral. Ethics pronunciation, utilitarianism considers the interests of all humans equally [ 13 ] in Concerning the Fundamental principle utility. Other sentient beings income they receive socially useful purpose measures the benefits and disadvantages drawbacks! Government services Mill justified rules on utilitarian principles Instead of an action is immoral determines right wrong... Job, rule utilitarianism and deontological his works was hedonistic, as the man. In Mind, 72, 1963, p. 36, Bentham 's book an Introduction to the decisions make. It aimed at [ 57 ]:55 it is followed are best determined by its utility main between...